Abuse victim from Bavaria sues Pope Emeritus Benedict
Article from June, now updated with Cathcon comment below.
Cathcon: Pope Benedict admitted to knowing about this case in January of this year. Following Father Gruber's resignation in 2010, I researched the statutes of the Archdiocese of Munich which I fortuitously found in the library of the University of Louvain. It was clearly stated there that the Archbishop was solely responsible for decisions relating to personnel. If one is looking for a reason for Pope Benedict's abdication, this is clearly the chief candidate, whether it was a pang of conscience or the progressives forcing the issue knowing that such a revelation while he was Pope would have forced him out of office.
This is Father Hullermann in his parish in an article I published at the time of Father Gruber's resignation
Abuse victim from Bavaria sues Pope Emeritus Benedict
It is a novelty from a legal point of view: for the first
time, a court could rule on the guilt of church officials such as the former
Archbishop and Pope Benedict XVI in an already statute-barred church abuse
case.
A 38-year-old man from Bavaria, who was abused as a child by the Catholic priest, Peter H., now will file a lawsuit in the District Court in Traunstein. The complaint, which has been made available to Bavarian Radio, the Correctiv Research Centre and the weekly newspaper, DIE ZEIT, is not only directed against the perpetrator but also against the Archdiocese of Munich and Freising and two former archbishops, the retired Pope Benedict XVI and his successor, Cardinal Friedrich Wetter.
Abused by Peter H. at the age of twelve
Julian Schwarz wants justice - for himself and other victims
of abuse. There should be no statute of
limitations for such acts, he says. "That's
psychological murder," says Julian Schwarz. "Children carry that with them all their
lives." That is why he has now filed a lawsuit with the district court in
Traunstein against the perpetrator, the Archdiocese of Munich and also the
former Pope.
Julian Schwarz was between eleven and twelve years old when
the priest showed him porn and sexually abused him. Julian Schwarz is not the real name of the
38-year-old today. He wants to remain
anonymous. After the abuse, much went wrong
in his life. At the time, Julian did
exactly the right thing and confided in his mother after the abuse: But she
didn't believe what her son said about the priest. "The pries pretty much lulled the whole
community to sleep and presented himself very well," says Julian. And after all, a priest works for the church,
so he wouldn't do "something like that". That was the unanimous opinion at the time.
"These are cases that actually could have been
prevented."
After the abuse, Julian slips down and gets worse at school
and runs away from home. He uses hard
drugs. In 2010, it became public for the
first time that the parish priest of Garching an der Alz and Engelsberg, Peter
H. already had a record for paedophile attacks in the Archdiocese of Munich and
Freising and was nevertheless repeatedly employed in the pastoral care of
children and young people. Julian
Schwarz also hears about it: "There are several cases, not just me, but
numerous cases that could actually have been prevented," he is convinced.
He reported to the public prosecutor's office in 2010 and
filed a criminal complaint. But the
investigations were stopped - the crimes are covered by the statute of limitations.
But now Julian Schwarz' lawyer, the
Berlin criminal lawyer, Andreas Schulz, believes he has found a way through
civil law to bring his client's case before a secular court after all. Specifically, he has filed a so-called
declaratory action with the District Court of Traunstein.
The court could retrospectively determine wrongdoing
The court could retrospectively examine whether the perpetrator and those responsible for his work in the Archdiocese are obliged to compensate his client for the damage he suffered as a result of the sexual abuse. "The plaintiff is not primarily concerned with money, but rather with establishing that what happened was wrong," says Andreas Schulz. How and to what extent compensation is then paid in the end is a completely different question.
Previously, victims whose cases of abuse were subject to the
statute of limitations had to turn to the institution of the perpetrators, the Church,
for recognition of their suffering. In
the lawsuit that has been submitted to BR, ZEIT and Correctiv, it is now in the
dock. Victim lawyer, Schulz sees an
institutional responsibility for sexual abuse in the Catholic Church:
"This is joint and several liability for all those involved in the
process."
Abuse report envisages
ex-Pope as responsible
In this line of argument, the lawsuit refers to the most
recent abuse report by the Munich law firm WSW and also to an ecclesiastical court
judgment in the Peter H case. This
decree from 2016 states that the former Archbishops Friedrich Wetter and before
that Joseph Ratzinger, who later became Pope Benedict, were informed about the paedophilia
of the priest, Peter H.. Benedict XVI denies that to this day. If the Traunstein District Court accepts the
lawsuit, the consideration of the facts could be reopened.
Munich legal scholar, Andreas Spickhoff sees the lawsuit as
a legally delicate construct that initially appears to have little prospect of success.
He is a professor of civil law at the
LMU Munich. Nevertheless, he sees an
opportunity: "The only possibility that exists would be for the church, as
the person responsible, as the person responsible for the organization, to
respond by waiving the statute of limitations. Then it would be possible that the claims for
damages of those affected could be fully examined again even in a proper court
process," says Andreas Spickhoff.
So far no claim for a ruling on damages
That means: Victims of abuse like Julian Schwarz have a
right to have their damages assessed, but only as long as the accused church
representatives do not say: The case is statute-barred. "You can do that, but you don't have to
do that. I know from other contexts that
occasionally, for political, ethical, moral reasons, the defence using the
statute of limitations is not used so that the victim can then have their claim
for damages assessed," according to the law professor.
And that is exactly the possibility that the victim’s lawyer,
Andreas Schulz relies on, especially since Canon Law even allows the statute of
limitations for cases of abuse to be lifted. "This lawsuit has a strategic goal: the Church
must position itself, whether it is defending itself formally, in a civil process,
for example by raising the plea of the statute of limitations, or whether it
is facing up to its historical and moral responsibility and guilt."
At least the former Archbishop of Munich and Freising,
Cardinal Friedrich Wetter seem willing to do so. In a first reaction to the lawsuit, he
announced to Correctiv, ZEIT and BR that he did not want to apply for a statute
of limitations. A spokesman for the
Archbishop's office in Munich asked for understanding "that the
Archdiocese of Munich and Freising is not commenting on ongoing legal
proceedings". The Pope Emeritus
left an inquiry unanswered by the time of going to press, as did former priest,
Peter H.
Comments
Post a Comment